Perspective[]
This needs to be rewritten in an in-universe perspective and moved to "Comics Code Authority (Sony Universe)". It was presented as a reference within the film and the CCA appeared to never have any involvement with any comic adaptation.--ARTaylor 02:10, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
- The CCA's seal of approval was only on screen for a few seconds. That's barley any information to make a full page on. And yes I know the CCA didn't have any involvement in the production of Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse. The company shut down in 2011. It was just a little easter egg for the long time comic book fans. I think we should keep the page as is. The Comics Code doesn't have any bearing on the actual plot of the movie. It's not like a character in the movie actually references the comics code and its not a major plot point so writing it as "in-universe" is pointless. Like I said it was just a fun little easter egg for the long time comic book fans.Brandonbaker01 (talk)
- "The CCA's seal of approval was only on screen for a few seconds. That's barley any information to make a full page on." It's okay to have small pages when there's not much in-universe to go on. We link to other sites that offer more in-depth information if someone really wants to know more. "And yes I know the CCA didn't have any involvement in the production of Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse. The company shut down in 2011." Exactly. There's no real world application the CCA has to our site. The CCA went defunct before the movie entered production, Marvel stopped working with them in the 2000s, and they have never been involved in adaptations. "It was just a little easter egg for the long time comic book fans." Exactly. It's just a thing in-movie like the PDNY and Coca-Cola. Sure, it's an odd reference that's unlike most others that's not connected to the story, but it's just another reference. It should be treated just like any billboard or sign.--ARTaylor 03:47, 11 July 2021 (UTC)