Thread:Rappy 4187/@comment-122823-20130314033639

I wish to talk to you about the image you deleted earlier today. Tossing aside the fact that what exactly is pornographic is debatable, there is a precedent for various levels of nudity on Wikia. shows roughly the same amount of butt crack (on a real woman) and at one point was deemed appropriate enough to be featured on the front page of one of the largest wikis. (also found on Wikipedia) and both show a completely nude woman from the front. The character is still nude even if the actress has make-up to cover certain features. has a woman in roughly the same position, shows more of her butt, is larger, and closer to her. And just because the artist colored her skin and added some wrinkles to imitate clothing doesn't make it any less sexual. is far more suggestive and one could argue shows camel toe on Black Cat. (Not trying to be a pervert, just making an argument)

The latter two images are used only in a gallery, whereas the deleted image was to illustrate a point in the trivia. Additionally, it helped to reinforce the Reception section, which discussed the problems dealt with combining the campy tone with darker elements of the story.

I also noted you seemed to have no problems with the various images of violence including a man using a sword to create a splash of blood, a dead man with arrows sticking out of him, and bodies on pikes being picked at by birds.

It seems to me that many of the terms used in the second point on the Terms of Use User Conduct can be flexible given the circumstances. 